Quantcast Royal Purple
College Media Network

Is smoking in public a right or privilege?

Jonathon Klain

Issue date: 4/2/08 Section: Lifestyle
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Non-smokers disapprove of second-hand smoke, while others believe it's their right as Americans, no matter who it harms.
Media Credit: Alison Wisneski
Non-smokers disapprove of second-hand smoke, while others believe it's their right as Americans, no matter who it harms.

In a time of tofu, an age of aerobics, and obsessions with omega-3 fatty acids, is there any room for the old Marlboro Man; a small piece of personal space for him to dust of his dirt stricken Wranglers, hang his hat and take a good long drag?

While most of the smokers in Whitewater may not be wearing Wrangler jeans, they are finding it harder to smoke without the disproval of others around them. Facing a moral dilemma, smokers must decide whether smoking in a public place is a right or a privilege.

Senior Coby Curkeet says he doesn't mind smokers, but would prefer people don't smoke around him.

"Personally I don't like smoking in the bars," Curkeet said. "The smoking ban is a good idea because if someone smokes a cigarette everyone around them has to suffer. If I have a drink in my hand no one is complaining."

Non-smokers and smokers alike enjoy a place they can gather without having to air out their winter-wear the next day.

Senior Justin Malmstadt, a smoker, says that second hand smoke bothers him.

"While being a smoker myself, I do not like the smell of second hand smoke, and while that may seem ironic, the truth is, going out in Whitewater hard to bare because of the smoke," Malmstadt said.

According to "The Burden of Tobacco," a report conducted by the University of Wisconsin Tobacco Surveillance and Evaluation Program, the American Cancer Society, and Wisconsin Division of Public Health's Tobacco Prevention and Control Program, Wisconsin has a frightening number of smokers and smoking related deaths.

The total number of smokers in Wisconsin is estimated at 1,005,000. Twenty-two percent are 18 years old or above, 8 percent are of middle school youth, and 14 percent are smoking during pregnancy.

Senior Matthew Powers says he is aware of the damage that smoking does but thinks smoking is both a privilege and a right.

"People who smoke are going to continue to do so whether the law says they should or they shouldn't.," Powers said. "People know they aren't supposed to urinate in public, but they still do. "

Junior and smoker James Gill says while he tries to be considerate to other people, they should be considerate to him.
"It's up to people to make their own decisions, and I think they should leave me alone with mine," Gill said.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 10

Kristine

posted 4/03/08 @ 5:40 PM CST

I know a lot of people who smoke, but the smoke still bothers me. I wish that people didn't stand so close to the doors when they smoked, because it makes it harder for students to get by and for some students, it can cause health problems. (Continued…)

Joey

posted 4/03/08 @ 8:21 PM CST

Maybe a better title for this article would be, "Is going to the bar a right or a privelege?"

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Paul

posted 4/04/08 @ 10:23 PM CST

Smoke if you want. Just don't do it indoors anywhere that there may be non-smokers present. Non-smokers generally don't appreciate the smoking related illnesses that come from breathing secondhand smoke. (Continued…)

john

posted 4/01/09 @ 10:43 AM CST

We as americans should be able to smoke when and where we want. People say this is the most free country in the world yet we are becoming more and more communist every single day. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Alberto Sanchez

posted 4/01/09 @ 3:43 PM CST

Wait, wait, wait, people are forced to go to the bars? Then the smoking ban is absolutely necessary! I can see if people had the choice of whether to go to a smokey bar or not, but since they are forced to go to a bar that allows smokers than smoking must be banned!

I always thought people had the right not to go to a private establishment if they were concerned about smokers on the premises. (Continued…)

Chester Kartoffelkopfe, flaneur

posted 4/02/09 @ 2:40 PM CST

Secondhand smoke is significantly toxic to inhalers. This is the current objective science. I'm "just letting the facts speak for themselves"--though of course they never do finally (factually, abortion IS a killing. (Continued…)

Kasey

posted 4/09/09 @ 12:26 AM CST

I feel that smokers have a right to smoke where it is allowed without feeling bullied by the non-smokers. Considering this is a college campus, the non-smokers are generally recieving looks from the party-goers and awesome people who stagger home drunk and wake everyone up. (Continued…)

michael burchnell

posted 4/22/09 @ 11:08 AM CST

SMOKING SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC BECAUSE ITS THE PERSONS OWN MISTAKE. ALSO IF SMOKING GETS BANNED THERE WILL NOT BE ANY WORKERS AT JOBS AND OTHER STUFF. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What benefits do you think UW-Whitewater will gain from the new online voting?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement

Sections

Options

Links